Approach<\/h4>\n\n\n\n- A combination of interviews and qualitative analysis techniques used to determine golf coaches\u2019 perceptions of the key technical parameters of a golf swing<\/li>
- A 17 segment, 6DOF biomechanical model of a golfer developed based on the motion of 63 strategically placed markers on the golfer<\/li>
- A range of different segment definitions for the hips and trunk evaluated including the use of functional joint centres<\/li>
- Trunk kinematics and x-factor compared using 2D and 3D angle definitions<\/li>
- Principle Component Analysis (PCA) evaluated for identifying differences in continuous time series data<\/li>
- A combination of PCA, fuzzy coding and multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) used to visualise associations within key biomechanics movement patterns and clubhead\u2013ball impact parameters <\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Key Findings<\/h4>\n\n\n\n- Five intrinsically linked key technical parameters were identified from interviews with elite golf coaches: \u2018Posture\u2019, Body Rotation\u2019, \u2018Arm and Wrist Action\u2019, \u2018Sequential Movement and Body Segments\u2019 and \u2018Club Motion\u2019 <\/li>
- Use of a two segment model is more appropriate for analysing the trunk during the golf swing<\/li>
- Principle Component Analysis (PCA) was able to extract subtle differences in both kinetic and kinematic data for different swings. Interpreting biomechanical meaning from PCA results remains challenging but the major differences found between data sets could usually be characterised as a change in offset, range of motion, timing and\/or velocity. <\/li>
- Statistically significant differences in X-factor (approximately 16\u00ba), trunk flexion at top of backswing (-6.5 \u00b1 3.6\u00ba) and trunk right-side lateral bend at impact (8.7 \u00b1 2.9\u00ba) were found between 2D and 3D methods. The results support the need to use a 3D method for kinematic data calculation in order to accurately analyse the golf swing<\/li>
- The COP and COG PC1 scores were strongly correlated in both medial\u2013lateral (ML) and anterior\u2013posterior (AP) directions. Clubhead velocity was related to timing and rate of change in COPML<\/sub> near downswing and timing of COGML<\/sub> late backswing. Golfers with earlier movement of COP to the front foot and rate of change patterns in ML COP, prior to the downswing, may be more likely to generate higher clubhead velocity.<\/li>
- PCA revealed subtle changes in swing biomechanics such as between fades, draws and low trajectory shots. Clusters of golfers that employ different biomechnical approaches were identified using the PCA results.<\/li>
- MCA can be used to simply and quickly identify movement patterns of a group of similar handicap golfers if supported with appropriate descriptive interpretation of the data. This technique also has the potential to highlight mismatched golfer biomechanics variables which could be contributing to weaker impact parameters.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Publications<\/h3>\n\n\n\n- Turner, J., Forrester, S.E., Mears, A.C., Roberts, J.R. (2020). The influence of tracking marker locations on three-dimensional wrist kinematics.<\/a> Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport<\/a><\/em>, 23(10), pp. 985 – 990.<\/a> <\/li>
- Mears, A., Roberts, J.R., Forrester, S.E. (2018). Matching golfers\u2019 movement patterns during a golf swing, <\/a>Applied Sciences<\/a><\/em>, 8(12)<\/a>.<\/li>
- Smith, A.C., Roberts, J.R., Kong, P.W., Forrester, S.E. (2016) Comparison of centre of gravity and centre of pressure patterns in the golf swing, <\/a>European Journal of Sport Science<\/a><\/em>, pp.1-11<\/a>.<\/li>
- Smith, A.C., Roberts, J.R., Wallace, E.S., Kong, P.W., Forrester, S.E. (2016) Comparison of two- and three-dimensional methods for analysis of trunk kinematic variables in the golf swing, <\/a>Journal of Applied Biomechanics<\/a><\/em>, 32(1), pp.23-31<\/a>.<\/li>
- Smith A.C., Roberts J.R., Wallace E.S., Kong P.W., Forrester S.E. (2015) Golf coaches’ perceptions of key technical swing parameters compared to biomechanical literature. <\/a>International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching<\/a><\/em> 10(4):739-755<\/a>.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n
PhD Researchers<\/h3>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/DSC5664a.jpg\")
<\/figure>\nDr Aimee Mears<\/strong> (nee Smith)<\/p>\n\n\n\nSmith, A.C. (2013). Coach informed biomechanical analysis of the golf swing. PhD Thesis<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/Rob-871x1024.jpg\")
<\/figure>\nDr Rob Leach<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\nLeach, R.J. (2017). The role of biomechanics in achieving different shot trajectories in golf. PhD Thesis<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/IMG_0875a.jpeg\")
<\/figure>\nJosh Turner<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\nTurner, J. (2021). The effect of golf club inertia on the golfer\u2013club interaction. PhD Thesis.<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\nGallery<\/h3>\n\n\n\nngg_shortcode_0_placeholder\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The golf swing is one of the most difficult movements in sport to perform and understanding swing mechanics is crucial for equipment development and performance analysis. Recent technological advances in motion capture, electromyography and force \/ pressure measurement offer considerable opportunities if used intelligently. Appropriate methodologies, however, are still not fully developed and the systems … Continue reading Biomechanical analysis of the golf swing<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":349,"parent":178,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"page-templates\/full-width-page.php","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-339","page","type-page","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/339","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=339"}],"version-history":[{"count":33,"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/339\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":555,"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/339\/revisions\/555"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/178"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/349"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=339"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Key Findings<\/h4>\n\n\n\n- Five intrinsically linked key technical parameters were identified from interviews with elite golf coaches: \u2018Posture\u2019, Body Rotation\u2019, \u2018Arm and Wrist Action\u2019, \u2018Sequential Movement and Body Segments\u2019 and \u2018Club Motion\u2019 <\/li>
- Use of a two segment model is more appropriate for analysing the trunk during the golf swing<\/li>
- Principle Component Analysis (PCA) was able to extract subtle differences in both kinetic and kinematic data for different swings. Interpreting biomechanical meaning from PCA results remains challenging but the major differences found between data sets could usually be characterised as a change in offset, range of motion, timing and\/or velocity. <\/li>
- Statistically significant differences in X-factor (approximately 16\u00ba), trunk flexion at top of backswing (-6.5 \u00b1 3.6\u00ba) and trunk right-side lateral bend at impact (8.7 \u00b1 2.9\u00ba) were found between 2D and 3D methods. The results support the need to use a 3D method for kinematic data calculation in order to accurately analyse the golf swing<\/li>
- The COP and COG PC1 scores were strongly correlated in both medial\u2013lateral (ML) and anterior\u2013posterior (AP) directions. Clubhead velocity was related to timing and rate of change in COPML<\/sub> near downswing and timing of COGML<\/sub> late backswing. Golfers with earlier movement of COP to the front foot and rate of change patterns in ML COP, prior to the downswing, may be more likely to generate higher clubhead velocity.<\/li>
- PCA revealed subtle changes in swing biomechanics such as between fades, draws and low trajectory shots. Clusters of golfers that employ different biomechnical approaches were identified using the PCA results.<\/li>
- MCA can be used to simply and quickly identify movement patterns of a group of similar handicap golfers if supported with appropriate descriptive interpretation of the data. This technique also has the potential to highlight mismatched golfer biomechanics variables which could be contributing to weaker impact parameters.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Publications<\/h3>\n\n\n\n- Turner, J., Forrester, S.E., Mears, A.C., Roberts, J.R. (2020). The influence of tracking marker locations on three-dimensional wrist kinematics.<\/a> Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport<\/a><\/em>, 23(10), pp. 985 – 990.<\/a> <\/li>
- Mears, A., Roberts, J.R., Forrester, S.E. (2018). Matching golfers\u2019 movement patterns during a golf swing, <\/a>Applied Sciences<\/a><\/em>, 8(12)<\/a>.<\/li>
- Smith, A.C., Roberts, J.R., Kong, P.W., Forrester, S.E. (2016) Comparison of centre of gravity and centre of pressure patterns in the golf swing, <\/a>European Journal of Sport Science<\/a><\/em>, pp.1-11<\/a>.<\/li>
- Smith, A.C., Roberts, J.R., Wallace, E.S., Kong, P.W., Forrester, S.E. (2016) Comparison of two- and three-dimensional methods for analysis of trunk kinematic variables in the golf swing, <\/a>Journal of Applied Biomechanics<\/a><\/em>, 32(1), pp.23-31<\/a>.<\/li>
- Smith A.C., Roberts J.R., Wallace E.S., Kong P.W., Forrester S.E. (2015) Golf coaches’ perceptions of key technical swing parameters compared to biomechanical literature. <\/a>International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching<\/a><\/em> 10(4):739-755<\/a>.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n
PhD Researchers<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<\/figure>\nDr Aimee Mears<\/strong> (nee Smith)<\/p>\n\n\n\nSmith, A.C. (2013). Coach informed biomechanical analysis of the golf swing. PhD Thesis<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<\/figure>\nDr Rob Leach<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\nLeach, R.J. (2017). The role of biomechanics in achieving different shot trajectories in golf. PhD Thesis<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<\/figure>\nJosh Turner<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\nTurner, J. (2021). The effect of golf club inertia on the golfer\u2013club interaction. PhD Thesis.<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\nGallery<\/h3>\n\n\n\nngg_shortcode_0_placeholder\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The golf swing is one of the most difficult movements in sport to perform and understanding swing mechanics is crucial for equipment development and performance analysis. Recent technological advances in motion capture, electromyography and force \/ pressure measurement offer considerable opportunities if used intelligently. Appropriate methodologies, however, are still not fully developed and the systems … Continue reading Biomechanical analysis of the golf swing<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":349,"parent":178,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"page-templates\/full-width-page.php","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-339","page","type-page","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/339","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=339"}],"version-history":[{"count":33,"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/339\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":555,"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/339\/revisions\/555"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/178"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/349"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=339"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Publications<\/h3>\n\n\n\n- Turner, J., Forrester, S.E., Mears, A.C., Roberts, J.R. (2020). The influence of tracking marker locations on three-dimensional wrist kinematics.<\/a> Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport<\/a><\/em>, 23(10), pp. 985 – 990.<\/a> <\/li>
- Mears, A., Roberts, J.R., Forrester, S.E. (2018). Matching golfers\u2019 movement patterns during a golf swing, <\/a>Applied Sciences<\/a><\/em>, 8(12)<\/a>.<\/li>
- Smith, A.C., Roberts, J.R., Kong, P.W., Forrester, S.E. (2016) Comparison of centre of gravity and centre of pressure patterns in the golf swing, <\/a>European Journal of Sport Science<\/a><\/em>, pp.1-11<\/a>.<\/li>
- Smith, A.C., Roberts, J.R., Wallace, E.S., Kong, P.W., Forrester, S.E. (2016) Comparison of two- and three-dimensional methods for analysis of trunk kinematic variables in the golf swing, <\/a>Journal of Applied Biomechanics<\/a><\/em>, 32(1), pp.23-31<\/a>.<\/li>
- Smith A.C., Roberts J.R., Wallace E.S., Kong P.W., Forrester S.E. (2015) Golf coaches’ perceptions of key technical swing parameters compared to biomechanical literature. <\/a>International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching<\/a><\/em> 10(4):739-755<\/a>.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n
PhD Researchers<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<\/figure>\nDr Aimee Mears<\/strong> (nee Smith)<\/p>\n\n\n\nSmith, A.C. (2013). Coach informed biomechanical analysis of the golf swing. PhD Thesis<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<\/figure>\nDr Rob Leach<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\nLeach, R.J. (2017). The role of biomechanics in achieving different shot trajectories in golf. PhD Thesis<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<\/figure>\nJosh Turner<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\nTurner, J. (2021). The effect of golf club inertia on the golfer\u2013club interaction. PhD Thesis.<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\nGallery<\/h3>\n\n\n\nngg_shortcode_0_placeholder\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The golf swing is one of the most difficult movements in sport to perform and understanding swing mechanics is crucial for equipment development and performance analysis. Recent technological advances in motion capture, electromyography and force \/ pressure measurement offer considerable opportunities if used intelligently. Appropriate methodologies, however, are still not fully developed and the systems … Continue reading Biomechanical analysis of the golf swing<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":349,"parent":178,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"page-templates\/full-width-page.php","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-339","page","type-page","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/339","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=339"}],"version-history":[{"count":33,"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/339\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":555,"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/339\/revisions\/555"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/178"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/349"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=339"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
PhD Researchers<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<\/figure>\nDr Aimee Mears<\/strong> (nee Smith)<\/p>\n\n\n\nSmith, A.C. (2013). Coach informed biomechanical analysis of the golf swing. PhD Thesis<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<\/figure>\nDr Rob Leach<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\nLeach, R.J. (2017). The role of biomechanics in achieving different shot trajectories in golf. PhD Thesis<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<\/figure>\nJosh Turner<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\nTurner, J. (2021). The effect of golf club inertia on the golfer\u2013club interaction. PhD Thesis.<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\nGallery<\/h3>\n\n\n\nngg_shortcode_0_placeholder\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The golf swing is one of the most difficult movements in sport to perform and understanding swing mechanics is crucial for equipment development and performance analysis. Recent technological advances in motion capture, electromyography and force \/ pressure measurement offer considerable opportunities if used intelligently. Appropriate methodologies, however, are still not fully developed and the systems … Continue reading Biomechanical analysis of the golf swing<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":349,"parent":178,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"page-templates\/full-width-page.php","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-339","page","type-page","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/339","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=339"}],"version-history":[{"count":33,"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/339\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":555,"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/339\/revisions\/555"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/178"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/349"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=339"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
<\/figure>Dr Aimee Mears<\/strong> (nee Smith)<\/p>\n\n\n\n Smith, A.C. (2013). Coach informed biomechanical analysis of the golf swing. PhD Thesis<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n Dr Rob Leach<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Leach, R.J. (2017). The role of biomechanics in achieving different shot trajectories in golf. PhD Thesis<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n Josh Turner<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Turner, J. (2021). The effect of golf club inertia on the golfer\u2013club interaction. PhD Thesis.<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n The golf swing is one of the most difficult movements in sport to perform and understanding swing mechanics is crucial for equipment development and performance analysis. Recent technological advances in motion capture, electromyography and force \/ pressure measurement offer considerable opportunities if used intelligently. Appropriate methodologies, however, are still not fully developed and the systems … Continue reading Biomechanical analysis of the golf swing<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":349,"parent":178,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"page-templates\/full-width-page.php","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-339","page","type-page","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/339","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=339"}],"version-history":[{"count":33,"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/339\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":555,"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/339\/revisions\/555"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/178"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/349"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonroberts.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=339"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}<\/figure><\/figure>Gallery<\/h3>\n\n\n\nngg_shortcode_0_placeholder\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"